Skip to main content

2012

For my second movie review, I am going to review a movie that isn't Oscar bound (well, maybe for special effects), is not a movie that many critics will like, and is what movies are supposed to be: entertainment!  That movie is 2012 starring John Cusack and Amanda Peet.  The premise is very similar to The Day After Tomorrow where a scientist finds out that our world is crumbling around us little by little. The difference with this movie is that the government is actually listening to the scientist and they begin to plan for December 21, 2012 when the scientist says the world will end.

John Cusack and Amanda Peet come in a estranged exes who still harbor feelings for each other and have to navigate through the world to get to the safe harbor that the government has been working on since 2009 when the science team found out about 12/21/2012.  Still with me? Let's move on then! Cusack takes his kids camping in Yellowstone National Park to find that the lake where they would be camping is completely dried up due to the earth's core burning the earth from the inside out.  This is how he finds out that the government is building arks for when the world becomes a water world (sounds very familiar). Here is where the interesting part comes into play and if you don't want to be spoiled DO NOT READ THE REST. You have been warned.

It is found out that even though these arks are being built that can hold up to 100,000 people on each (there were 5 made but one was damaged beyond repair) the citizens of the world were not known about it. There was no lottery for them to try and get on. The political heads of the world were given passes and then geneticists were tasked with picking people with the right genes to repopulate the world after 12/21/2012.  In other words, if you didn't have the right genes you were not allowed on the arks; you were left for dead.

When our societies do not work together, this is what will happen.  Bureaucrats will let themselves survive rather than their own people , the ones they serve. They will have people of influence, the rich survive while the middle and poor classes will not get on because they are not deemed worthy or eligible of continuing our world and society.  Our worlds need to work together to protect this world from ourselves and our petty differences. In the end, when it comes down to the end of the world, we are all human beings and nothing more. Even though 2012 is a movie, dramatizing the fictional end of the world, the emotions and life lessons still ring true. Science Fiction and Fantasy movies especially are one of the best outlets to get certain opinions about today's issues out in the open without actually saying them.  These types of movies take you to another world so you don't think of your own but in reality, the issues in this other world are the same issues we deal with here - that no one wants to talk about.

I enjoyed this movie. It was thought provoking, sad at times (but what disaster movie isn't), happy at times and at the end, it made me want to write about it and show the world (aka people who read this) what the movie was trying to say ever so subtly. As I mentioned before, this movie isn't an Oscar worthy movie with regards to acting or directing or producing. What this movie is and why it is good, its entertainment. The reason people go to the movies is to be entertained by the actors, the plot, and anything else that goes into a movie.  It is cheaper than a play or comedy show (as long as you don't get a lot of food at least). If you like science fiction, disaster movies then you will be entertained by this. And the fact that John Cusack is in this kind of movie instead of a drama or romantic comedy is also something to entertained by. He isn't a bad action film star. If you decide to watch it, let me know what you think!

Until next time . . . .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Last Song

Before I begin this review, I must put a disclaimer. The only way I got through this movie was to look past Miley Cyrus as the lead. With that said, so starts my review. With imagination running out in Hollywood, producers have to look to other forms of entertainment for inspiration. Nicholas Sparks books have always been a very good place with hit movies such as A Walk to Remember, Message in a Bottle, and The Notebook. In 2010, Hollywood made 2 of his books into movies - Dear John and The Last Song starring Miley Cyrus and Greg Kinnear. Before seeing this movie, I made it a point to read  the book so I could compare the two mediums. This story wasn't a typical Sparks novel in the sense of about finding your true love. This is a story about the dysfunctional yet oddly functional relationship between an 18-year old teenage and her estranged father. Roni and her 10 year old brother come to live at their father's house in South Carolina, on the water, for the summer much to ...

"For a Few to be Immortal, Many Must Die" - In Time

It is an interesting topic – living forever.   We all have said at one point or another we want the fountain of youth to bless us with eternal beauty and life.   But what would living forever mean? You would see history happen right before your eyes – and see it written in history books for children to read during school.   If you had been living forever, you could have seen the curse start for the Red Sox in 1918 and then get broken in 2004.   And again in 2007.   But what it would it mean?   By living forever, you don’t like a day in your life. If you live forever, what makes tomorrow so special.   The people in District 12 have it better than the rich – they have to make very moment, every second count. In Time, starring Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried, is set in 2161 where a genetic alteration has allowed humanity to stop aging past age 25.   But people are required to earn more time in order to stay alive past age 25 or their ...

Don't Lose the Magic: Shadowhunters Season 1

The Shadowhunter world is powerful. Not because of magic, steles, demons, or potions but of the emotions tied to every single character.  Cassandra Clare wielded such heartening characters in her books that bringing the world to the big and little screen seemed almost too much.  When the movie came out, it didn’t live up to the hype of many dedicated fans. Now with the show having gone through its 1st season (and the 2nd season on the horizon) the question is the same: can the producers of the show keep Clare’s world in tact and please everyone?  That is a resounding no. When the news first broke that The Mortal Instrument books series would be turned into a television show I was optimistic.  The feature film had a lot of buildup and hype. Unfortunately it did not live up to the majority’s expectations and fell flat when it was released.  I enjoyed it from a movie and entertainment viewpoint but when comparing it to the book it left something to be desired...