Skip to main content

The Hunger Games - Movie

Movies show you how. Books show you why.  With any movie adaptation of a widely popular book, the filmmakers will inevitably not please every movie-goer.  But this movie-goer was very impressed and thoroughly enjoyed the movie adaptation of The Hunger Games.  The movie hit 95% of the major points in the book so it flowed very well and kept me watching and wondering what was going to happen next.  Even though I knew what was going to happen next, it was exciting to see it happen on screen and see my imagination come to life. The 5% that did not match with the book I will get into later. For now, let’s dwell on the positive and exciting parts of the movie.


Jennifer Lawrence and Josh Hutcherson were wonderful. Lawrence looked as if she had been studying the book intently to before Katniss.  Hutcherson has grown as an actor. In this movie, he was able to change from the boy-next door to the one people should watch out for in the arena in a split second. He made me believe in him both as an actor and as the character. That is a sign of a very good actor.  Lawrence was just as equally good if not better.  Katniss is not an easy character to become. You have to find the balance between being strong and letting all of your feelings show in order to keep going.  She handles that like a veteran.  As the movies progress into Mockingjay, I am excited to see the change in Katniss and Lawrence; the wall she has built in front of her gets torn down and her not being able to hold anything back.


I found that The Hunger Games movie was more in tune with the book than any of the Twilight or Harry Potter movies.  There wasn’t anything added in the movie that was not in the book and the writers and director did not change the progression of events.  It would have been difficult considering that every scene had something to do with the scenes before it. That might seem like an obvious observation but as a person who enjoys movies and sees a good number of them that is not an easy thing to accomplish. In Harry Potter I remember some of the not so important scenes were taken out of context and I was left wondering why did they do that and to what purpose?  It might have made sense to the people who saw the movie and didn’t read the book but to the Harry Potter book fans, it left us confused.  Getting back to The Hunger Games, I wasn’t confused about the storyline. What I was confused about were the things that were left out and more importantly downplayed.


The number one thing I did not like about the movie was how the relationship between Peeta and Katniss was downplayed. There is so much more of that in the book that sets up a lot of what happens in the other two books. I feel like the movie didn’t give the relationship any chance. The readers know that Peeta’s feelings are true but in the movie, you have no idea if they are true or false. You don’t get an inkling either way until the end when Peeta asks Katniss what do they do now and she answers we forget and he answers back but I don’t want to forget and looks at her longingly.  Other than that, it looked as if Peeta was just playing the part of the star-crossed lover and not actually feeling it. Everything else about the movie I enjoyed. As a movie-goer, I knew that not everything in the book could be portrayed on screen unless the director wanted to make a 3-4 hour movie.  That might have worked for Titanic back in 1997 but not for today’s entertainment savvy population.  2.5 hours is even pushing it but then again with movies like Harry Potter and Twilight going 2.5 hours each, The Hunger Games is simply following suit with regards to the length.


As with most books to movies, I enjoyed the book better than the movie. But when looking back at the last 3 big book-to-movie franchises – Harry Potter, Twilight, and The Hunger Games – I loved The Hunger Games the best. It was more true to the book than any of the other book to movies. It was harsh and direct and it wasn’t afraid to be either of those things.  That is something that is lacking in today’s great movies.  The producers and directors are so worried about offending anyone so they play it safe most of the time.  Not Hunger Games.  They didn’t get the memo. And good thing, otherwise the movie would have been shelved on the “it’s OK” shelf and probably never seen again.  It made a big impression. Now the wait is on to see if Catching Fire will create as much spark and excitement as its predecessor.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Once Upon A Time

Out of all of the new shows I had decided to watch this year, it comes as so surprise that the one show I have kept up with the most is the show from the same producers as Lost – Once Upon A Time.    The show is about a boy, Henry, who believes that his town – Storybrooke, Maine – is really the Enchanted Forest and everyone has forgotten who they are. He came to that idea from a book he was given by his teacher, Mary Margaret who Henry believes is really Snow White.   He believes his adoptive mother, Regina, is really the Evil Queen, his therapist is Jiminy Cricket, the John Doe in the hospital is Prince Charming, and the one who can save everything is Emma, his birth mother who gave him up for adoption 10 years ago. And did I mention that Henry believes Emma to be the daughter of Snow White and Prince Charming?   Henry also believes that the Evil Queen cast a curse on the whole Enchanted Forest which is why they can’t remember who they are. Still with me? Good. Let’...

"For a Few to be Immortal, Many Must Die" - In Time

It is an interesting topic – living forever.   We all have said at one point or another we want the fountain of youth to bless us with eternal beauty and life.   But what would living forever mean? You would see history happen right before your eyes – and see it written in history books for children to read during school.   If you had been living forever, you could have seen the curse start for the Red Sox in 1918 and then get broken in 2004.   And again in 2007.   But what it would it mean?   By living forever, you don’t like a day in your life. If you live forever, what makes tomorrow so special.   The people in District 12 have it better than the rich – they have to make very moment, every second count. In Time, starring Justin Timberlake and Amanda Seyfried, is set in 2161 where a genetic alteration has allowed humanity to stop aging past age 25.   But people are required to earn more time in order to stay alive past age 25 or their ...

A Forgotten Book

When you have a list of over 400 books on your to-read list, you tend to forget that you put some of them on the list. Station Eleven by Emily St. John Mandel is one of those books. I used the randomizer on my Goodreads list to give me my next book after Landline. It gave me Station Eleven. I tried racking my brain, willing myself to recall when I put this on my list and my mind couldn’t come up anything. I guess that is what happens with over 400 books on your list. Station Eleven is about the post-collapse United States and Canada and the characters that have lived through it (and some that haven’t).  A flu broke out in Toronto that had an incubation period of less than 24 hours once exposed.  Only 1 in 3000 survived the outbreak.  Everything is gone - electricity, internet, gas, everything that we take for granted all gone in a couple of years.  The story moves back and forth between pre-collapse and post-collapse as well as between 3 main character lives. ...